All posts by montesyrie@gmail.com

The Company We Keep: Project 180, Day 78

This ain’t workin’.

Yesterday, I finally sat down to some serious book work (August is closer than it seems, and I have vowed to avoid my habits of procrastination). Hoping to find a flow, I stumbled into a stop. And just like that, forty minutes in, I was lost, and a mini-crisis crept into my being, as I confronted doubt for the first time, realizing my plan wasn’t going to work. August got closer.

But as I stopped, I remembered. And I turned to my old companions, Do, Reflect, and Do Better (my three amigos), and they pointed the way. And a bit abashedly, I set to reflecting, asking myself two questions:

What do I know?

What do I need to figure out?

And, after a time, what was lost was found. A better idea, more motivation, and a settled spirit. I found my way once again, and–once again–it was reflection who saved me.

But this isn’t supposed to be a post about the progress of the Project 180 book; it’s supposed to shine a light on the creative process, illuminating the necessity of time and reflection, two resources that are scarce in our classrooms. I

think about the creative work (not only in the “artistic” sense) we ask our kids to do, and then I think about the “hurry-them-along” reality of their experiences, and I can’t help but think of how diminished their experiences are because we cannot, do not, (will not?) give them time to learn.

I would suggest that if there’s no real reflection, there’s no real learning. But that takes time, and that runs counter to the educational experience we give our kids. We seem to be content–and confident–that grades in the grade book are sufficient sign posts of learning, but I wonder if they aren’t but bread crumbs that disappear, for there is rarely a way back or time to travel if there is. And that’s learning’s loss. That’s our kids’ loss.

I am lucky. I have time to reflect. I have time to learn. And, importantly, I have a publisher who understands and supports the creative process, so I have time to find what’s working when it’s not. And this is in the real world. Yes, I have a deadline (that can change), and yes, I have a lot of work to do, but, I want to do the work, for I find the work worthy because I am learning. And that is what I want for our kids. Work not to be graded, but work to be worked out, wrestled with, reflected upon. I want our kids to learn–for the rest of their lives. I want them to carry the company of the learner’s constant companions: Do. Reflect. Do Better. That is the company I want them to keep.

Happy Monday, all.

Do. Reflect. Do Better.

Work of Wonder: Project 180, Day 77

Every day. Every day I wonder if I might be wrong. Some days the wonder is sharper, and I worry I’ve wandered too far off center. Other days it’s less sharp, and I am less-concerned about being off course. But whether sharp, whether dull, the wonder waits for me, an old friend now as I wander the wilds of disrupting the status quo.

I used to call it doubt–the devil dancing on my shoulder. He would visit in my weaker moments, and I would dance with him. I had no choice. But as I’ve wandered farther along the path, I have distanced myself from doubt. And my commitment to better has been the breakaway.

I do not doubt what I am doing. I am doing–I believe–what I have to do. I set out to find better because I had to. Unsettled, unhappy with the way things were, I set out to discover what might be. And as I have journeyed along, wandered about, I have discovered the work of wonder.

Not in the “wonderful” sense but in the “worryful” sense. Every step a wonder. But doesn’t that get heavy, all that worry? No. Well, maybe a little. But I have come to discover that wonder is the work of better. It is from my wonders that I find my better. Oh, plenty of missteps and dead ends along the way–plenty. But those have been balanced by discoveries of new possibilities. And that’s the work of better, which begins and continues–never ceasing–with wonder.

I have to imagine that many of you are on your own journey to better. I have to imagine that you, too, have danced with doubt. I have to imagine that you, too, have wondered in your wandering. And if so, then, it seems we are not alone on this adventure, our paths not separate. And if I may from one wanderer to another, embrace your wonders, the sharp and the dull, for they are the work and the way of better. And more, if there is a worry, it’s when we cease to wonder.

Happy Friday, all. I hope your day is full of wonder.

Do. Reflect. Do Better.

The Question: Project 180, Day 76

I am going to ask you a question. But as I ask it (as you read it), I want you to focus on the feeling from the question instead of the answer to the question. Here’s the question.

Who are you?

I can only imagine–literally, I can only imagine–but I like to imagine you felt the question. It digs in. It takes hold. It stays, for it is a sticky question. It’s awkward to ask; it’s awkward to answer–even for ourselves. And it tends to stick around for the entirety of our lives. Who Am I?

But I think between the two (Who are you? and Who Am I?), there’s an important difference to be discovered.

Though they are basically the same, and though we generally explore the same spaces to discover an answer, there’s a difference. “Am I” comes from the inside, and “Are you” comes from the outside. Yes, I know, obviously. But when it does–if it does–come from the outside, what is the asker really asking? Our name? Our occupation? Our gender? Our background? Does the asker even know? Is it a superficial question, or is it a deeper question? Either, both, neither? Maybe it’s just superficial small talk. But what if it was deeper? What if when we asked someone, “Who are you?” we really, actually wanted to know. And, in turn, when we are asked this question what could we, would we, should we actually share?

Yesterday, I asked my kids the question, for I really, actually want to know. And, I really, actually want them to think about what they could/would/should share. Here’s the assignment.

I have given many “Who Am I?” assignments to kids over the years, but yesterday, I decided to change it a bit and asked instead, “Who are you?”

And I asked them to imagine the answer as a t-shirt for the world to see. And this is why. The question needs to be asked; the answer needs to be known. I imagine a lot of what’s wrong in the world stems from our not knowing because we are not asking. We don’t really know ourselves. And we don’t really seem to care about knowing others. But what if we did know?

If school is just a microcosm of and a springboard to society, then when is there a better time to begin asking and knowing? When I dreamt up the t-shirt idea, this is what I imagined. Crowded hallways with kids in their “who shirts.” As kids approach each other from the front, they see the “who” in the shirt. As kids follow from behind, they consider the “who” in their own shirts. I imagine a connected cosmos of constant “whoness.”

And while it may well be that this is simply a conjuring from over-caffeination, I believe sincerely that who matters–now, later, ever. So, I asked the question because I want to know.

I haven’t looked at the kids’ answers from yesterday, but I am eager to see where they began. I am more eager to see where they continue. I wish I had thought of this earlier in the semester. Next semester, we will start on day one.

What’s the deal with the “Biggest-Ever Writing Assignment.” Oh, I was mostly messing with the kids, seeking to get their attention. Many of them dread the work of writing, so I thought I would “scare” them a bit. But I also had something else in mind with “big.” One, it’s big because it’s them. Two, it’s big because it’s less. It’s only one sentence. But it’s so much more than that. Some kids will simply write, “I am Ben.” But others will really wrestle with this. And as we continue with it each day, they–I believe–will grapple a great deal with “who.” And that’s just what I want them to do.

Happy Thursday, all.

Do. Reflect. Do Better.

The Hidden Life of Students: Project 180, Day 75

“If you read the professional literature, you quickly get the impression that the well-being of the forest is only of interest insofar as it is necessary for optimizing the lumber industry… Because it was my job to look at the hundreds of trees every day–spruce, beeches, oaks, and pines–to assess the their suitability for the lumber mill and their market value, my appreciation of trees was also restricted to this narrow point of view.”

Peter Wholleben, The Hidden Life of Trees

“If you read the professional literature you quickly get the impression that the well-being of education is only of interest insofar as it is necessary for optimizing the testing industry… Because it was my job to look at hundreds of students every day–high, low, in-between–to assess their suitability for the testing mill and their academic value, my appreciation of students was also restricted to this narrow point of view.”

Monte Syrie, the Hidden Life of Students.

I am reading the Hidden Life of Trees right now , and as I am, I am finding many parallels between trees and students, forests and education. And while I don’t have time to fully formulate my thinking on this this morning, I was struck again by this parallel as I sat in the dark with cup of coffee number one, wondering about John and how I was going to find the right feedback for him. For him. Not for Sally or Jimmy or Susie, but John. His tree and the necessary nutrients for him to grow. And I found it. Not in the rubric. In him. I had to see him in the forest, and I did.

“Life as a forester became exciting once again. Every day in the forest was a day of discovery. This led me to unusual ways of managing the forest. When you know that trees experience pain and have memories and that tree parents live together with their children, then you can no longer just chop them down and disrupt their lives with large machines.”

Peter Wholleben, The Hidden Life of Trees

“Life as a teacher became exciting again. Every day in the classroom was a day of discovery. This led me to unusual ways of teaching the classroom. When you know that students experience pain and have memories and that parents live together with their children, then you can no longer just rank and sort them and disrupt their lives with large tests.”

Monte Syrie, The Hidden Life of Students

John needs me to see him and what lies hidden. But he also needs me to see the rest of the trees in the forest, the Sallys, the Jimmys, and the Susies. For there are roots there that feel, that connect, that remember.

“I will never stop learning from them, but even what I have learned so far under their leafy canopy exceeds anything I could have ever dreamed of. I invite you to share with me the joy trees can bring us. And, who knows, perhaps on your next walk in the forest, you will discover for yourself wonders great and small.”

Peter Wholleben, The Hidden Life of Trees

“I will never stop learning from them, but even what I have learned so far under their lofty spirits exceeds anything I could ever have dreamed of. I invite you to share with me the joy students can bring us. And, who knows, perhaps during your next lesson in the classroom, you will discover for yourself wonders great and small.”

Monte Syrie, The Hidden Life of Students.

I will never stop learning from them.

Happy Wednesday, all. Sorry for the odd post.

Do. Reflect. Do Better.

Lost: Project 180, Day 74

Many are viewing this time as “The Great Deficit.” Gaps are gaping. Scores are slipping. We will have a generation lost. Will we? Academically speaking, was this view any less true than it is now? Hasn’t this been the battle cry–and even the sales pitch–for some time now, the call to follow the achievement scores and the rally behind the rise of the standardized mechanism in modern education? If so, then maybe we’ve been living in The Great Deficit for decades.

Interestingly, I am not sure this time is affecting academics as much as we fear. Oh, there are certainly new challenges, and yes there’s less, but we have met many of those challenges (in some rather innovative and effective ways), and maybe–just maybe–less is more. Academically speaking.

More interestingly, there’s a fevered pitch to promote and support social-emotional learning, as if finally some are waking to the idea that there’s more at play than academics when it comes to educating humans. I am not suggesting it wasn’t a push before the pandemic, but my observations, both near and fear, have revealed a more pronounced push than ever before.

Most interestingly, at least to me, this shines a bright light on the real deficit in American public education: the lack of humanization in our kids’ experiences. And our remote reality has revealed this in ways heretofore unseen. Yes, we cry content loss, but kids can learn content online, and we can teach content online. And if we had to stay at it, we’d get more efficient at the content trade. That we can address, that we can adapt to, that we can accomplish, but we can’t reach kids. Well, certainly not as we could in person. Some may argue that the same is true for content, and while I get that, and I don’t necessarily disagree, I’d point out that the difference is the human connection, not the instruction that makes the difference. But, then, isn’t that what we had before? Humans sharing space? Yes, but that does not necessitate connection. Kids can quickly become blank screens with names in person if we are just simply the audio at the front of the room. Connection transcends occupancy.

Okay, so where’s the “deficit,” what’s the point? This. For years a focus on content and achievement has led us away from the humans in the room. And the lamentations of lost learning during this time–I fear–will overshadow what we are discovering about human connection when we return. Importantly, I think more are seeing the human side than ever before, but I worry they will assign the need to the pandemic and forget about it when we return. And if that happens, we lose. Kids lose. Generations lost.

Wow. Serious topic to tackle at 4:30 AM. I am sure contradictions abound above, but this was in craw this morning, and I had to get it out. Sorry. Happy Tuesday, all.

Do. Reflect. Do Better.

A Simpler Step: Project 180, Day 73

“I know I haven’t been doing any work, at all. But do you think you could send me like a list of things to do to get caught up at least a little bit?”

Once upon a classroom, I might have pointed out that there is already a list.

Once upon a classroom, I might have pointed out the inconvenience of such a request.

Once upon a classroom, I might have pointed out that we only have 18 days left in the semester.

But I no longer teach in that classroom.

In today’s classroom, I will reconsider the list and his situation, focusing on a path of possibility for him.

In today’s classroom, I will consider the courage it took for him to own his situation, focusing on his needs, not my convenience.

In today’s classroom, I will consider the illusory effect of time on our blip of an experience, focusing on what’s left rather than what’s lost.

Now, in simple speak. I have a kiddo who finally faced his situation. I have a kiddo who needs a lifeline. I have a kiddo who needs my empathy.

In simpler speak. I have a kiddo who needs help.

In simplest speak. I have a kiddo.

Kiddo. Kiddos, that’s the work. No one the same. No path perfect. I teach each. And each is as different as my responses have to be.

That’s the room, the space I find myself in these days. I teach kids. That’s the plain path I follow, the simple in my step.

Happy Monday, all. Glad to be back. Hope all are healthy and happy.

Do. Reflect. Do Better.

We’re writing a Book!

Happy New Year, all. I have some exciting news to share with you.

Project 180 is on its way to becoming a book in 2021!

I have partnered with the team at Code Breaker Inc. (http://codebreakeredu.com) to bring Project 180 to life as a book by the end of Summer ’21. I am so stoked and grateful to have this opportunity to work with these awesome folks.

Moving 180 from blog to book was always on the horizon, but I always imagined it much farther down the road. However, now, as we wrap up year five of the 180 journey, the horizon is here. I will provide more details in the near future, but for now, I just wanted to ring in the new year with this news. And I wanted to thank you all for helping me grow 180 for the last five years. I am excited to see where this next path takes us. Would not be here without you. Thank you for all your kind support.

Wishing everyone a happy, safe 2021. Take care.

Do. Reflect. Do Better.

In Search of Who: Project 180, Day 72

Dang. Deleted. Just deleted the post for fear that I was gonna run out of time. I guess that’s what happens when inspiration waits until the third cup of coffee. So, it’ll have to wait now until after break. But maybe that’s good better.

Till then, here’s a sneak peak at the perk I got from cup three this morning.

And I am wrestling–every day, as I face the sobering struggle of connecting my “who’s” with my “how’s” for the “what’s” of the work. And I wanted to write about it this morning, but time decided otherwise. I will continue to pursue the who after break. Sorry, all.

And with that, I will wish everyone a happy, safe holiday. Take care.

Do. Reflect. Do Better.

Limping Along: Project 180, Day 71

Morning, all. Kinda limpin’ along right now. The kids aren’t motivated. I’m not motivated. I imagine that’s likely the case in classrooms across the country–the globe–right now. Always a tough time to be motivated with break so close, this year seems even tougher. But to the kids’ credit, they are still limping along with me, and we are just trying to maintain forward motion. And maybe that’s all we can hope for. Forward.

Of course, some kids aren’t moving at all, not an inch. And while I try not to take that personally during this time, it’s hard. I try. I beg and beseech. But they ain’t budging. And I won’t resort to a heavy hand, so they stay where they are. Oh, I circle back each day to check on them, to see if anything has changed, but there they stand immovable. And though it taps on my teacher forehead, reminding me of my duty; it also tugs at my human heart, reminding me of my humanity. And I limp, accepting the burden of the back and forth between my heart and head, my movers and my stayers. All I can do. I’m only human.

Happy Thursday.

Do. Reflect. Do Better.

Rubric Regard: Project 180, Day 70

But what if it’s not on the rubric?

We’ve all been there, I imagine. There, ya know, that place where things don’t quite fit the form, that place where we meet learners and there’s no other way to adequately describe it other than “messy.”

It doesn’t fit, no matter the scale. Oh, we try, in earnest, to consider and capture all the places where we imagine kids should be, crafting carefully the language of the levels, some times mincing words ad nauseum, finally settling on something. And we enter the arena, positive we have the Rosetta in hand to capture and call the learning we encounter. But then, it happens. We find something outside the neat niches we have carved, and we pause.

And in the pause, one of two things happens. We force the fit. Or we forget the fit. If we force the fit, we just find the level that seems best, we color it with edspeak, and assign a number (honoring the rubric). If we forget the fit, we acknowledge that when we introduce humans into the mix, things get messy and we have to find a way that works, not a way that fits (honoring the learner). So we forget the fit. And then the guilt sets in.

Whether we force it or forget it, we are left wondering and worrying. Not in a debilitating way. We don’t have time for that. But more in a nagging, unsettling way. Something’s not right. And it all comes back, I believe, to the rubric.

So, we should not use rubrics? Maybe. But no, I am not going to say that out loud. Most of us have to use rubrics. It is the mark of good teaching. Just try to get through your yearly observations without presenting a rubric to your evaluator. So, I am not suggesting we abandon rubrics. But I am suggesting that we regard them less reverently.

Do, I use rubrics? No. I present success criteria for our priority standards so we know where we are headed, and when I can, I use the criteria as entry points into the feedback/response process, but when I can’t, I don’t. Criteria are guides, not gospel. In the mess that is learning–and teaching–I have found the need to steer outside the margins. So, I do. But I am not saying that makes me a great teacher. I am saying that if being a good teacher means strict adherence to a rubric, then I don’t want to be a good teacher. I’ve only every wanted to be a better teacher. And I have found being better means being responsive to the learner in front of me, even when–especially when–she doesn’t fit the form.

Happy Wednesday, all.

Do. Reflect. Do Better.